Skip to main content

Full text of "Treatise On Analysis Vol-Ii"

See other formats


11    THE SPACES L1 AND L2       161

To show that Lg is complete, it is clearly enough to prove (i) and (ii). We
have already proved (i) in the case p = I (13.8.5). When p = 2, it follows from

00

the hypotheses and (13.11.3.1) that the function ]T \gn\ is finite almost every-

n= 1

00

where (13.6.4), and hence the series £ \gn(x)\ converges in R for almost all

n= 1

00                                                                                  00

x e X. Hence the same is true for £ gn(x\ and since \g(x)\ g £ \0n(x)\ almost

n=1                                                      «= 1

everywhere, we have N2(#) < +00 by (13.11.3.1). Moreover, g is measurable
(13.9.11), hence its class belongs to LR. Since

000 ~

^ I

for all n and almost all x e X, it follows fr6m (13.11.3.1) that

which is arbitrarily small for large n. Hence g = £ gn.

n = I

(ii)   To prove the first assertion, it is enough to show that, for a suitably

oo

chosen subsequence (/nfc), the series fni (x) +  £ (/»fc+i(*) -/»*(*)) converges

almost everywhere, and that if /(x) is its sum (defined almost everywhere)
then/ = lim /„. We define the sequence (nk) inductively to satisfy

for all k ^ 1 (and nv = 1); then it follows from (i) that the series

/.,<*)+ Z (/*„(«) -/„,(*))

fc=i
converges almost everywhere and that, if f(x) is its sum, then/=lim/Wk

fc->oo

in Lg. Since (/„) is a Cauchy sequence, it follows that /= lim /„ in Lg,

If"* 00

by (3.14.2). To prove the second assertion, the preceding argument maybe
applied by replacing the sequence (/„) by any subsequence (fni) which has a
limit almost everywhere.

(iii)   For each n let gn =    sup    \fn+h -fn+t\. Then gn is ;> 0 and meas-

urable (13.9.11), and belongs to J$?g~ (13.9.1 3) because \gn\ ^ 2/7. The sequence
(gn) is decreasing and by hypothesis tends to 0 almost everywhere, hence